|
|
||||||
|
#1
04.11.2007, 06:09
|
|
|
|
|
Success! Yes, nitpickers, I know I missed it on Wednesday.
"Air pollution laws will prevent a new runway being built at Heathrow for at least another decade, according to a newspaper report..." "...The plans have provoked huge opposition among those living in the affected areas. But Heathrow will be ruled out until airport operator BAA has dealt with the high levels of pollution around the airport - which is unlikely to be until 2016 or later, according to The Times..." More: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/3242669.stm |
|
|
|
#2
04.11.2007, 07:38
|
|
|
|
|
Doug wrote:
> Success! Yes, nitpickers, I know I missed it on Wednesday. > > "Air pollution laws will prevent a new runway being built at Heathrow > for at least another decade, according to a newspaper report..." > > "...The plans have provoked huge opposition among those living in the > affected areas. > > But Heathrow will be ruled out until airport operator BAA has dealt > with the high levels of pollution around the airport - which is > unlikely to be until 2016 or later, according to The Times..." > > More: > > [..] What "success"? The efforts of the protestors haven't defeated BAA's wishes to build a new runways. They will simply bide their time, get the rules changed whilst the airlines and aircraft builders tweak their designs and along comes the new runway. There might well be a delay, but it is nothing to do with the protests by climate change campaigners. Yet again you have to try and take credit (even vicariously) where none is due. |
|
#3
04.11.2007, 09:07
|
|
|
|
|
On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 00:09:49 -0700, Doug wrote:
> Success! Yes, nitpickers, I know I missed it on Wednesday. > "Wednesday, 5 November, 2003," huh? The third runway won't cause Heathrow to break any pollution limits, because its been breaking them for years. Steve |
|
#4
04.11.2007, 11:23
|
|
|
|
|
"Doug" <jagmad> wrote in message
news:2700 > Success! Yes, nitpickers, I know I missed it on Wednesday. Wednesday 5th November 2003 Fucking retard |
|
#5
04.11.2007, 14:01
|
|
|
|
|
Brimstone wrote:
> "Gizmo." <Nothome> wrote in message > news:1865 >> "Doug" <jagmad> wrote in message >> news:2700 >>> Success! Yes, nitpickers, I know I missed it on Wednesday. >> Wednesday 5th November 2003 >> >> Fucking retard > Hmmm, is Doug a Time Traveller and Shifter? Or maybe he doesn't know what > day of the week or date it is? We've seen his total inability to live in todays world before have we not? |
|
#6
04.11.2007, 14:54
|
|
|
|
|
"Gizmo." <Nothome> wrote in message
news:1865 > > "Doug" <jagmad> wrote in message > news:2700 >> Success! Yes, nitpickers, I know I missed it on Wednesday. > > Wednesday 5th November 2003 > > Fucking retard Hmmm, is Doug a Time Traveller and Shifter? Or maybe he doesn't know what day of the week or date it is? |
|
#7
04.11.2007, 15:36
|
|
|
|
|
John Wright wrote:
> Brimstone wrote: >> "Gizmo." <Nothome> wrote in message >> news:1865 >>> "Doug" <jagmad> wrote in message >>> news:2700 >>>> Success! Yes, nitpickers, I know I missed it on Wednesday. >>> Wednesday 5th November 2003 >>> >>> Fucking retard >> Hmmm, is Doug a Time Traveller and Shifter? Or maybe he doesn't know >> what day of the week or date it is? > > We've seen his total inability to live in todays world before have we > not? I'm not sure he lives in any world, except his own. |
|
#8
05.11.2007, 07:53
|
|
|
|
|
"Brimstone" <brimstone520-ng01> wrote in message
news:nz2d > Doug wrote: > > What "success"? The efforts of the protestors haven't defeated BAA's > wishes to build a new runways. They will simply bide their time, get the > rules changed whilst the airlines and aircraft builders tweak their > designs and along comes the new runway. > > There might well be a delay, but it is nothing to do with the protests by > climate change campaigners. > > Yet again you have to try and take credit (even vicariously) where none is > due. No reaction then Doug? |
|
#9
08.11.2007, 20:38
|
|
|
|
|
Doug wrote:
> Success! Yes, nitpickers, I know I missed it on Wednesday. > just bigger planes which use more fuel |
|
|
| Similar Threads | |
| Heathrow 3rd runway - not yet cancelled? The Tories said they were going to cancel the Heathrow 3rd runway, but I haven't heard yet that they've done it. Michael Bell |
|
| Heathrow third runway It seems that a lot of people are against the additional runway at Heathrow. It caused a number of former government minister to vote against the proposal. [..] |
|
| OT - 3rd runway at Heathrow What do umrats think about the issue? I instinctively incline to no 3rd runway but have heard some of the arguments for it. I think Susan Kramer is a sensible person and... |
|
| No new runway for Heathrow There has just been a report on News 24 that the White Paper to be published in mid-December will NOT recommend a third Runway for Heathrow at this time. Instead it will... |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:24. | Privacy Policy
|
'No new runway at Heathrow'