Now I am sure the boy enjoyed himself greatly, but what if this were a
man allowing himself to be seduced by a 14 year old schoolgirl. He'd
be in the klink faster than you can say paedofiddlier!


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...ays-judge.html


Sharon Edwards, 40, walked away from Teeside Crown Court after the
judge ruled that she had been flattered by the boy's attention as a
result of feeling trapped in an unhappy marriage and had let herself
be seduced by him.

The court heard that Edwards had sex with the boy a total of four
times between September 2007 and January 2008.

Edwards' husband Mark first became suspicious because she was
exchanging 50 text messages a day with the boy, prosecutor Tina
Dempster told the court.

He spoke to her about he number of text messages she was sending to
the boy but she said they were just having a laugh.

He began checking his wife's computer for MSN messages and, through
these, discovered that her lover was a youngster who went to the same
school as their two sons.

Mr Edwards then contacted the boy's mother who called the police.

The next day the boy was interviewed by police and confirmed that he
had had a crush on her and that they had had sexual intercourse the
previous night.

In one of the MSN chats the boy even asked her to buy him cocaine, and
she said that she would not want any money for it.

Deborah Sherwin, defending, said that it was clear from the video
interview that police carried out that the boy was tall at six foot
one, and mature for his age.

Judge Peter Fox QC told her: "You have been a very unhappy lady for a
very considerable period of time when this 14-year-old boy seduced you
and not you him both so far as sexual matters and as far as drugs are
concerned."

He added that Mrs Edwards did have a responsibility as an adult to
reject the boy's advances but said that he regarded the case as an
exceptional one.

She pleaded guilty to four charges of sexual activity with a child and
offering to supply a Class A drug and was given a 12 month suspended
jail sentence and ordered to register as a sex offender for five
years.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...ays-judge.html

On 14 Oct, 09:48, Ed <EdwardABow> wrote:
> Now I am sure the boy enjoyed himself greatly, but what if this were a
> man allowing himself to be seduced by a 14 year old schoolgirl. He'd
> be in the klink faster than you can say paedofiddlier!
>
> [..]...
>
> Sharon Edwards, 40, walked away from Teeside Crown Court after the
> judge ruled that she had been flattered by the boy's attention as a
> result of feeling trapped in an unhappy marriage and had let herself
> be seduced by him.
>
And the boy walked away with a big smile on his face :)

But yes, it is an unfair world and it wouldn't have worked the other
way round.

On Oct 14, 9:55 am, Dom Robinson <pickp> wrote:
> On 14 Oct, 09:48, Ed <EdwardABow> wrote:> Now I am sure the boy enjoyed himself greatly, but what if this were a
>>
> And the boy walked away with a big smile on his face :)
>
> But yes, it is an unfair world and it wouldn't have worked the other
> way round.

Roman Polanski? Countless rock stars?

Ed wrote:

> Now I am sure the boy enjoyed himself greatly, but what if this were a
> man allowing himself to be seduced by a 14 year old schoolgirl. He'd
> be in the klink faster than you can say paedofiddlier!

The spirit of the law, I would argue, is to find out and
limit/punish those that get their sexual thrills from
deliberately targeting immature youngsters. It's the low
age and innocence that's driving their desires. We, as
a society, have decreed that that is simply wrong and
must be stopped. But that's a world away from
someone sleeping with someone who they think are
older, or at least appear to the world as older. It's
simple attraction, not a desire for immaturity that
drives the connection. Though once someone finds
out the true age and yet continues, then that's a
different case again.

As for gender whining, then that's just pathetic. The
world is still mostly owned and run by males and
patriarchal societies and to whinge about how poorly
poor little men are treated just shows what a fucked
up view of the world you have. Grow some gonads.

Regards

Mark

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:55:36 -0700 (PDT), Dom Robinson <pickpops>
wrote:

... On 14 Oct, 09:48, Ed <EdwardABow> wrote:
... > Now I am sure the boy enjoyed himself greatly, but what if this were a
... > man allowing himself to be seduced by a 14 year old schoolgirl. He'd
... > be in the klink faster than you can say paedofiddlier!
... >
... > [url down]...
... >
... > Sharon Edwards, 40, walked away from Teeside Crown Court after the
... > judge ruled that she had been flattered by the boy's attention as a
... > result of feeling trapped in an unhappy marriage and had let herself
... > be seduced by him.
... >
... And the boy walked away with a big smile on his face :)
...
... But yes, it is an unfair world and it wouldn't have worked the other
... way round.

A man could be suspect of using force on a 14 year-old girl (even if she was
willing), but can you really say this woman forced the 6 ft boy to have sex with
her?

Guys, *you* organised the world this way - live with it.


=====
It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does.

On Oct 14, 11:03 am, "Mark A" <mannetts-nos> wrote:
> Ed wrote:
> > Now I am sure the boy enjoyed himself greatly, but what if this were a
> > man allowing himself to be seduced by a 14 year old schoolgirl. He'd
> > be in the klink faster than you can say paedofiddlier!
>
> The spirit of the law, I would argue, is to find out and
> limit/punish those that get their sexual thrills from
> deliberately targeting immature youngsters.

Yes it is, which is probably why the judge made this ruling. It
doesn't change the fact that it is illegal to have sex with a minor.

> As for gender whining, then that's just pathetic. The
> world is still mostly owned and run by males and
> patriarchal societies and to whinge about how poorly
> poor little men are treated just shows what a fucked
> up view of the world you have. Grow some gonads.

Where was I moaning how poorly men are treated?

Ed <Edward.A.Bowden> writes:

>Now I am sure the boy enjoyed himself greatly...

Doctors say boy will be scarred for life as there is at present no
medical procedure available to wipe the grin off his face.

Graham

Ed wrote:

> Where was I moaning how poorly men are treated?

Fair enough. Add "Anyone who..." in the approriate
places.

Regards

Mark

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:48:24 -0700 (PDT), Ed <Edward.A.Bowden>
wrote:

... On Oct 14, 11:03 am, "Mark A" <mannetts-nos> wrote:
... > Ed wrote:
... > > Now I am sure the boy enjoyed himself greatly, but what if this were a
... > > man allowing himself to be seduced by a 14 year old schoolgirl. He'd
... > > be in the klink faster than you can say paedofiddlier!
... >
... > The spirit of the law, I would argue, is to find out and
... > limit/punish those that get their sexual thrills from
... > deliberately targeting immature youngsters.
...
... Yes it is, which is probably why the judge made this ruling. It
... doesn't change the fact that it is illegal to have sex with a minor.
...
... > As for gender whining, then that's just pathetic. The
... > world is still mostly owned and run by males and
... > patriarchal societies and to whinge about how poorly
... > poor little men are treated just shows what a fucked
... > up view of the world you have. Grow some gonads.
...
... Where was I moaning how poorly men are treated?

"Unfair world". When women protest they are whiny and feminists, if not much
worse. When a man protest "he wasn't protesting..." Suuuuuuuuuure.


=====
It sounds much better in French, but then, everything does.

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:48:24 -0700 (PDT), Ed
<Edward.A.Bowden> wrote:

>On Oct 14, 11:03 am, "Mark A" <mannetts-nos> wrote:
>> Ed wrote:
>> > Now I am sure the boy enjoyed himself greatly, but what if this were a
>> > man allowing himself to be seduced by a 14 year old schoolgirl. He'd
>> > be in the klink faster than you can say paedofiddlier!
>>
>> The spirit of the law, I would argue, is to find out and
>> limit/punish those that get their sexual thrills from
>> deliberately targeting immature youngsters.
>
>Yes it is, which is probably why the judge made this ruling. It
>doesn't change the fact that it is illegal to have sex with a minor.

No, the fact she was punished _underlines_ the fact it's illegal. I
mean WTF are you arguing about? Just because something is illegal
doesn't mean you will go to jail for doing it.

>> As for gender whining, then that's just pathetic. The
>> world is still mostly owned and run by males and
>> patriarchal societies and to whinge about how poorly
>> poor little men are treated just shows what a fucked
>> up view of the world you have. Grow some gonads.
>
>Where was I moaning how poorly men are treated?

Here: "but what if this were a man allowing himself to be seduced by a
14 year old schoolgirl. He'd be in the klink faster than you can say
paedofiddlier!"

You were whining that (sometimes) men get put in jail for molesting
kids. You were obviously not whining that this cunt was not jailed (as
she should have been), because, in your expert opinion, no doubt
derived from years of enviously reading letters in Mayfair about lads
shagging their aunties, the kid "enjoyed himself greatly" shagging a
slack, wrinkled, drug-dealing, used-up old slag when he could have
been with a hot 16 year-old schoolmate instead.

On 14 Oct, 14:29, Froot Bat <m> wrote:
[..]
> 14 year old schoolgirl. He'd be in the klink faster than you can say
> paedofiddlier!"
>
> You were whining that (sometimes) men get put in jail for molesting
> kids. You were obviously not whining that this cunt was not jailed (as
> she should have been), because, in your expert opinion, no doubt
> derived from years of enviously reading letters in Mayfair about lads
> shagging their aunties, the kid "enjoyed himself greatly" shagging a
> slack, wrinkled, drug-dealing, used-up old slag when he could have
> been with a hot 16 year-old schoolmate instead.

Could he? You know for a fact there was a "hot 16 year-old schoolmate"
willing and available?
And this "slack, wrinkled, drug-dealing, used-up old slag" - know her,
do you?

The truth (sad though it is) is that the lad would have probably (at
least temporarily) had a boost to his self-esteem, whereas a girl in a
reversed situation would not.

On Oct 14, 2:29 pm, Froot Bat <m> wrote:
[..]
> 14 year old schoolgirl. He'd be in the klink faster than you can say
> paedofiddlier!"
>
> You were whining that (sometimes) men get put in jail for molesting
> kids. You were obviously not whining that this cunt was not jailed (as
> she should have been), because, in your expert opinion, no doubt
> derived from years of enviously reading letters in Mayfair about lads
> shagging their aunties, the kid "enjoyed himself greatly" shagging a
> slack, wrinkled, drug-dealing, used-up old slag when he could have
> been with a hot 16 year-old schoolmate instead.

He went back at least three more times. I am sure he enjoyed the sex
greatly.

I'm more worried about her admission that she would give him cocaine.

Froot Bat wrote:
[..]
> paedofiddlier!"
>
> You were whining that (sometimes) men get put in jail for molesting
> kids. You were obviously not whining that this cunt was not jailed (as
> she should have been), because, in your expert opinion, no doubt
> derived from years of enviously reading letters in Mayfair about lads
> shagging their aunties, the kid "enjoyed himself greatly" shagging a
> slack, wrinkled, drug-dealing, used-up old slag when he could have
> been with a hot 16 year-old schoolmate instead.
>

You missed out *fanny like a deflated life-raft*

On Oct 14, 4:06 pm, Sofa - Spud <comfyso> wrote:
> Froot Bat wrote:
>>
>>
> You missed out *fanny like a deflated life-raft*- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I bet the 40yr old would be a far better shag than a 16 year old
virgin! Her chest might not be as close to her chin though!

Ed wrote:
> On Oct 14, 4:06 pm, Sofa - Spud <comfyso> wrote:
>
> I bet the 40yr old would be a far better shag than a 16 year old
> virgin! Her chest might not be as close to her chin though!

Not if you were 14!

frankly as a young lad older women looked like grannies!

I'm reminded reading this story of the book Notes on a Scandal - not the
film but the book, what would she see in a spotty youth , what would he
see in a tired old boot.