|
#16
|
|
|
|
|
On Jun 18, 1:28 pm, billy.shea...@o2.co.uk wrote:
> On 18 June, 12:28, Simon Field <ee> wrote: > > [snip] >> ----- >> That's correct. I added National Express because they price the route, > and decided that a Business Saver would be an Off Peak Return, whereas > I think the other TOCs made the Saver an Off Peak Return. Hence the > confusion. The fare from London to Wick was £138.90 "Any Permitted > Route", should Inspector Field need further evidence. ;) So did you undertake this journey pre-'simplification' when the ticket was marked as being a "Business Saver" (or whatever the code for that is)? If so, the comment about "a fares 'simplication' that leaves the conductors confused" doesn't make much sense either. I'm confused! |
|
|
|
#17
|
|
|
|
|
On Jun 18, 1:13 pm, Theo Markettos <theom+n>
wrote: > John B <s> wrote: > > Had it been a National Express Super Off Peak Return, it wouldn't have > > been valid on his train. > > > I'm assuming it was simply a Super Off Peak Return...? > > Isn't it on that funny bit of the ECML (was it York-Newcastle?) where > tickets are 'Route: NXEC only' or 'Route: XC only' but no interavailable > flexible tickets? Why /is/ that allowed, anyway? Does this actually happen? (If so then maybe someone else - i.e. Northern - price the fare, though it wouldn't be York-Newcastle.) |
|
#18
|
|
|
|
|
On Jun 18, 2:34 pm, Mizter T <mizte> wrote:
> On Jun 18, 1:28 pm, billy.shea...@o2.co.uk wrote: >> >> >> > So did you undertake this journey pre-'simplification' when the ticket > was marked as being a "Business Saver" (or whatever the code for that > is)? > > If so, the comment about "a fares 'simplication' that leaves the > conductors confused" doesn't make much sense either. > > I'm confused! Well, the conductor was confused too. One thing is important - My Super Off Peak Return was valid on any XC train between Edinburgh and York. The conductor acted like it wasn't, but that he was doing me a favour by graciously letting me pay for my Weekend First upgrade. If this had happened before the fares "simplication" then I suspect my ticket would have said Business Saver, not Super Off Peak Return. |
|
#19
|
|
|
|
|
On Jun 18, 2:34 pm, Mizter T <mizte> wrote:
> On Jun 18, 1:28 pm, billy.shea...@o2.co.uk wrote: >> >> > > So did you undertake this journey pre-'simplification' when the ticket > was marked as being a "Business Saver" (or whatever the code for that > is)? > > If so, the comment about "a fares 'simplication' that leaves the > conductors confused" doesn't make much sense either. > > I'm confused! Argh, I've managed to confuse myself! Billy Shearer didn't make any mention of him holding a Business Saver ticket, he only spoke of holding a Super Off Peak Return - my apologies. |
|
#20
|
|
|
|
|
On Jun 18, 4:15 pm, billy.shearer wrote:
> On Jun 18, 2:34 pm, Mizter T <mizte> wrote: >> >> >> > (See my other post where I admit to having confused myself!) > > Well, the conductor was confused too. > > One thing is important - My Super Off Peak Return was valid on any XC > train between Edinburgh and York. The conductor acted like it wasn't, > but that he was doing me a favour by graciously letting me pay for my > Weekend First upgrade. > > If this had happened before the fares "simplication" then I suspect my > ticket would have said Business Saver, not Super Off Peak Return. No - for NXEC priced tickets pre-'simplification' a Super Off Peak Return would have been a Saver, whilst an Off Peak Return would have been a Business Saver. |
|
#21
|
|
|
|
|
billy.shearer wrote:
> One thing is important - My Super Off Peak Return was valid on any XC > train between Edinburgh and York. The conductor acted like it wasn't, > but that he was doing me a favour by graciously letting me pay for my > Weekend First upgrade. > > If this had happened before the fares "simplication" then I suspect my > ticket would have said Business Saver, not Super Off Peak Return. It would have said Saver presumably. The Business Saver became the 'normal' Off Peak Return, which appeared to be an NXEC pricing trick, according to previous discussions here... Paul |
|
#22
|
|
|
|
|
On 18 June, 18:17, "Paul Scott" <notvalidpmsc>
wrote: > billy.shea...@o2.co.uk wrote: > > One thing is important - My Super Off Peak Return was valid on any XC > > train between Edinburgh and York. The conductor acted like it wasn't, > > but that he was doing me a favour by graciously letting me pay for my > > Weekend First upgrade. > > > If this had happened before the fares "simplication" then I suspect my > > ticket would have said Business Saver, not Super Off Peak Return. > > It would have said Saver presumably. The Business Saver became the 'normal' > Off Peak Return, which appeared to be an NXEC pricing trick, according to > previous discussions here... > > Paul See how confusing it is? I feel sorry for the conductor now...! |
|
#23
|
|
|
|
|
Theo Markettos <theom+news> wrote:
>John B <spam> wrote: >> Had it been a National Express Super Off Peak Return, it wouldn't have >> been valid on his train. >> >> I'm assuming it was simply a Super Off Peak Return...? > >Isn't it on that funny bit of the ECML (was it York-Newcastle?) where >tickets are 'Route: NXEC only' or 'Route: XC only' but no interavailable >flexible tickets? Why /is/ that allowed, anyway? Perhaps it is a legacy of the ECML electrification and upgrade under BR in the early 90s, when a surcharge was added to all ECML fares to contribute to the cost of the project. I think the fare supplement applied only to InterCity East Coast and Regional Railways services, but it is a long time ago and I cannot be sure. However, I recall that there was at least one discussion about it on this very newsgroup, I think probably in the second half of 1998 or first half of 1999. |
|
#24
|
|
|
|
|
On Jun 17, 11:58 pm, EE507 <ee> wrote:
> Spotted this linked from the, er, GC website: > > [..]... > > Personally, I never had issues with GNER grippers (in contrast to many > uk.railway GNER-hating whingers), but I have noticed an increase in > threatening announcements about ticket validity under NXEC, adding to > the general deterioration in on-board service. Only one train in action at the mo - this always seems to catch GC by surprise - at a time when they should be caning BowkerRail: Disruption to Services We apologise to passengers for the current disruption to our services. We are attempting to restore our normal level of service as soon as possible, however due to technical difficulties the following alterations will apply. Sunday 21st June 2009 1342 Sunderland - London - This service will start from York at 1615- a coach service will be provided for passengers from Hartlepool at 14:10, Eaglescliffe at 14:45 and arriving at York at 15:55. 1345 London - Sunderland - This service will terminate at York - a coach service will convey passengers for Eaglescliffe , Hartlepool and Sunderland from York Station departing at 16:00. 18:42 Sunderland - London - This service is cancelled. Monday 22nd June 2009 0804 London to Sunderland - this service is cancelled. Where services are cancelled, or part cancelled, Grand Central staff will be available at key stations to provide onward travel arrangements. For further information please contact 0845 6034852. Grand Central apologises for any inconvenience caused. |
|
|
|
|
| Similar Threads | |
| Grand Central Living near Hartlepool, being mean and preferring Mk3s is Grand Central reliable at present? I'm also keen to support the underdog... Andrew |
|
| another entry to blog This might interest you, Barb. Two more 50-word stories [..] |
|
| new blog entry You might like to visit the blog at [..] and yes, the address works! I checked. |
|
| a new entry to the blog I paid heed to all your advice! [..] comments and further advice always welcome! |
|
| Central Heating feed/expansion entry points Hi, I have been perplexed by advice from suppliers' literature. If I am going to install my own CHS, I need to know how to design it to avoid beginners' problems - like... |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:11. | Privacy Policy
|