Source http://www.sfx.co.uk/page/sfx?entry=...i_awards_20102

SFX SCI-FI AWARDS 2010 WINNERS: BEST TV SHOW

1. Supernatural
2. Doctor Who
3. Torchwood
4. True Blood
5. Battlestar Galactica

How the ?!


Next

http://www.sfx.co.uk/page/sfx?entry=...i_awards_20103

SFX SCI-FI AWARDS 2010 WINNERS: BEST TV EPISODE

1. "Children Of Earth" Episode Five (Torchwood Season Three)
2. "Criss Angel Is A Douchebag" (Supernatural Season Four)
3. "The Next Doctor" (Doctor Who Special Number One)
4. "Planet Of The Dead" (Doctor Who Special Number Two)
5. "Needs" (Dollhouse Season One)


Alan Sailsbury and john smith will be pleased.


Next http://www.sfx.co.uk/page/sfx?entry=...i_awards_20104


SFX SCI-FI AWARDS 2010 WINNERS: BEST ACTRESS

1. Eve Myles (Torchwood: Children Of Earth)
2. Cate Blanchett (The Curious Case Of Benjamin Button)
3. Mary McDonnell (Battlestar Galactica)
4. Megan Fox (Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen)
5. Anna Friel (Pushing Daisies)


Next: http://www.sfx.co.uk/page/sfx?entry=...i_awards_20105

SFX SCI-FI AWARDS 2010 WINNERS: BEST ACTOR

1. David Tennant (Doctor Who)
2. Hugh Jackman (X-Men Origins: Wolverine)
3. Zachary Quinto (Star Trek/Heroes)
4. Peter Capaldi (Torchwood: Children Of Earth)
5. Edward James Olmos (Battlestar Galactica)

REad the rest.

The Doctor wrote:
> Source [..]
>
> SFX SCI-FI AWARDS 2010 WINNERS: BEST TV SHOW
>
> 1. Supernatural
> 2. Doctor Who
> 3. Torchwood
> 4. True Blood
> 5. Battlestar Galactica
>
> How the ?!
>
How the what? You don't think those shows deserve it?

I'm glad to see Supernatural winning awards - it got People's Choice
this year.

*snip*

Natalie

http://www.supernaturalusa.net

> The Doctor wrote:
>> Source [..]
>>
>> SFX SCI-FI AWARDS 2010 WINNERS: BEST TV SHOW
>> 1. Supernatural

I'll stop you there. How the FUCK has Supernatural won ANYTHING to do with
SciFi?
If anything its genre base is horror.

Its not even vaguely to do with SF. Fiction yes, Science hardly.

In article <fXmbn.28593$fu3.12291>,
Wickeddoll <not> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote:
>How the what? You don't think those shows deserve it?
>
>I'm glad to see Supernatural winning awards - it got People's Choice
>this year.
>
>*snip*
>
>Natalie
>
>[..]

I would take DW over SN any day.

In article <_cnbn.16835$En7.14530>,
Raymond Daley <raymond.daley> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>> Source [..]
>>>
>>> SFX SCI-FI AWARDS 2010 WINNERS: BEST TV SHOW
>>> 1. Supernatural
>
>I'll stop you there. How has Supernatural won ANYTHING to do with
>SciFi?
>If anything its genre base is horror.
>
>Its not even vaguely to do with SF. Fiction yes, Science hardly.
>
Well many have listed it under sci-fi but your point is well taken.

On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 23:47:01 -0000, "Raymond Daley"
<raymond.daley> wrote:

>> The Doctor wrote:
>>> Source [..]
>>>
>>> SFX SCI-FI AWARDS 2010 WINNERS: BEST TV SHOW
>>> 1. Supernatural
>
>I'll stop you there. How the FUCK has Supernatural won ANYTHING to do with
>SciFi?
>If anything its genre base is horror.
>
>Its not even vaguely to do with SF. Fiction yes, Science hardly.
>
It's a yardstick for the merit of the awards; which evidently come
from geeks immersed in sadistic violence with a vaguely
extra-terrestrial theme.

In article <dd1sm5l3lplk3nd54sfot6dhp369itnqlq>,
Ignis Fatuus <Ignis> wrote:
>On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 23:47:01 -0000, "Raymond Daley"
><raymond.daley> wrote:
>
>It's a yardstick for the merit of the awards; which evidently come
>from geeks immersed in sadistic violence with a vaguely
>extra-terrestrial theme.

10/10 IF.

The Doctor wrote:
> Wickeddoll wrote:
>
> I would take DW over SN any day.

I tried DW - really hard, but I just couldn't get into it.

Natalie

The Doctor wrote:
> Raymond Daley wrote:
>
> Well many have listed it under sci-fi but your point is well taken.

Honestly, I don't see it even as horror - nothing on there really scares
me. (except Dawn Ostroff getting her paws on it) I'm more into the
dramatic elements of it, but I see what you're saying.

Natalie

Raymond Daley wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>> Source [..]
>>>
>>> SFX SCI-FI AWARDS 2010 WINNERS: BEST TV SHOW
>>> 1. Supernatural
>
> I'll stop you there. How the FUCK has Supernatural won ANYTHING to do with
> SciFi?
> If anything its genre base is horror.
>
> Its not even vaguely to do with SF. Fiction yes, Science hardly.

I dunno about horror, I don't think so. But Fantasy yes, sort of a
subset of scifi.

Wickeddoll wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
>
> I tried DW - really hard, but I just couldn't get into it.

My sweetie got some of the old series with the original Dr on them as a
christmas gift. We went through those and he bought the first season of
the latest series. We're liking them.

suzeeq wrote:
> Raymond Daley wrote:
>
> I dunno about horror, I don't think so. But Fantasy yes, sort of a
> subset of scifi.

It really can't fit any other category - I just want it recognized.

Natalie

suzeeq wrote:
>
> My sweetie got some of the old series with the original Dr on them as a
> christmas gift. We went through those and he bought the first season of
> the latest series. We're liking them.

Most of its fans seem to be downright religious about it, but it just
didn't grab me.

Natalie

In article <hkkgei.2tc.1>,
Wickeddoll <not> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote:
>
>I tried DW - really hard, but I just couldn't get into it.
>
>Natalie


Oh! Well.

In article <hklavc$hfc$1>,
suzeeq <suzee> wrote:
>Raymond Daley wrote:
>
>I dunno about horror, I don't think so. But Fantasy yes, sort of a
>subset of scifi.

Scifi and fantasy are usually mutexed.